Issues related to the Disability Support
System in Illinois
For the past thirty years, community
programs run by local, non-profit
organizations have grown to become the
predominant provider of support services for
people with disabilities in Illinois. The
state's public policies related to people
with disabilities have changed from models
based upon large institutions, to smaller,
more family-like settings provided by these
community organizations. The future will
continue to show increasing demands for
community-based programs. It is the goal of
the Institute on Public Policy for People
with Disabilities (IPPPD) to work in tandem
with state government officials to help meet
this new demand, while improving services to
all persons currently in the state's
disability support system.
Since 1990, funding for institutional
programs has grown at a rate 25% higher than
the cost-of-living. As efforts to contain
costs at all levels of state government
increase, Illinois will be hard pressed to
justify the high per-capita costs in its
institutional settings.
In stark contrast to institutions,
funding to community-based providers in
Illinois has lagged behind the
cost-of-living by almost 50%. As greater
numbers of people with disabilities choose
community-based settings, agency caseloads
will become overloaded. A statewide crisis
of care will eventually ensue, with
increases in safety and health problems
blamed on Illinois' lack of adequate
funding.
It is predicted that both of these
scenarios will become significant public
issues during the next Governor's term,
leaving Illinois with no choice but to
haphazardly spend millions of dollars on
quick fixes that most likely, will have no
long-term impact on the disability support
system. The end result will only be more
turmoil and spending to solve a problem that
should have been avoided.
This is why the IPPPD is promoting a
collaborative approach between the state and
all providers of disability support
services. Statewide, there is universal
agreement that the health and safety of
Illinois citizens with disabilities must be
protected; and that the time to start is
now. There are five broad issues that we
have identified for initial discussions and
planning:
1. Development of consistent community
services statewide
2. Maintaining the quality of services
3. Review of existing rate determination
processes
4. Maintaining financial integrity within
the statewide disability support system
5. Redesigning the statewide disability
support system
Consistent Community Services-There has
been no new disability service initiatives
in Illinois except those forced by class
action litigation. Statewide, there is a
wide disparity in the available services for
persons with disabilities. Families find it
difficult to know where to start in their
efforts to obtain needed support services.
Today, there is widespread acceptance of
family support and raising children at home
instead of in institutional settings. As a
result, millions of Illinois tax dollars
have been saved in state-run children's
residential and other related program costs.
However, with no adult mandate for
services, thousands of these children have
no opportunity to participate in adult day,
employment or residential programs. Their
learned skills begin to deteriorate. Over
their lifetime, more taxpayer resources will
be utilized for support than if services
were available without interruptions.
The primary provider of support is
usually an elderly, single, female parent,
whose greatest concern is "who will take
care of my son/daughter with a disability
after I am gone?" As the caretaker
population begins to dwindle, the state will
be faced with a tremendous number of future
emergency placements. Currently, Illinois
has no effective means by which to measure
this burgeoning demand for services.
Quality of Services-By their very nature,
all human service organizations are labor
intensive. As a result, any deterioration in
the quality of staff will impact the quality
of services. Hiring good staff is a major
concern for all businesses, especially those
organizations supporting people with
disabilities.
Expenses related to recruiting, training
and education are higher than ever, yet most
organizations continue to have difficulties
finding good employees. These difficulties
are directly related to the decline in
purchasing power that human service
providers have experienced as a result of
limited state funding increases.
In other states, long-term under-funding
of human service programs has led to
significant increases in abuse, neglect,
health and safety issues for persons with
disabilities. Without assurances that rates
will keep pace with inflationary forces, and
despite our best efforts, it is reasonable
to assume that Illinois will also experience
these same difficulties.
There is a growing acknowledgement in the
media of the inadequacy of funding in
Illinois for human service programs.
Unfortunately, most media sources thrive on
controversies and failures within
government. They are having a field day in
California; if Illinois allows our funding
decline to continue, the media will have
their opportunity here as well.
Rate Determination Processes-Quality of
services is also related to the rates paid
by the state for disability support
services. Despite a nationwide ranking of
number six?? in per-capita income, Illinois
ranks forty-??? in the nation on per-capita
spending for disability support services.
Add to this, the rate bias in favor of
institutions, other dual rate systems,
geographic and historical rate differences,
and you end up with inequities that often
place organizations in conflict against each
other.
Current methodologies claim to consider
individual differences in the type of
support needed, but in reality, are labor
intensive variations of doling out only what
the state has budgeted for the year. Rate
determination lags behind decision-making,
creating financial hardships for the
non-profit agencies providing services. Rate
changes, such as the six month review under
the Community Integrated Living Arrangement,
make it difficult for providers to meet
people's changing needs with any long-term
sense of security.
Financial Integrity-Community providers
of human services in our state understand
the many competing interests that government
must consider. However, Illinois must
question the fiscal prudence of saving
dollars today, only to have us spend
multiple times these amounts tomorrow to
provide the needed supports. Not only does
this kind of "planning" not make fiscal
sense; it systematically jeopardizes the
health and safety of people with
disabilities. Based upon experiences in
other parts of the country, today's limited
savings, will translate into millions of
dollars spent tomorrow on measures with
questionable long-term value.
Additionally, Illinois must consider the
question of whether taxpayers will continue
to accept the ever-increasing, per-capita
costs of institutional care. As more
resources go toward fewer institutional
residents, fiscal accountability issues will
begin to rise. The disability support
system, already under-funded, will not be
able to afford these increased institutional
costs.
Community-based organizations are already
feeling the brunt of the funding
limitations. Most started as partners with
Illinois, providing services with some sense
of fiscal integrity and security coming from
the state. Thirty years of experience has
given us many funding delays, changes in
payment structures, unfunded mandates,
absurd audit and oversight requirements,
inflexible funding categories and a host of
other issues that stifle creative and
cost-effective support.
System Redesign-Over the past twenty
years, American business and industry has
undergone significant change. New
competitors, deregulation, technological
improvements, pricing, quality and a host of
other issues have caused restructuring,
mergers, acquisitions and bankruptcies of
many different companies. Although it is
still too early to judge, Illinois
government, as evidenced by the creation of
the Illinois Department of Human Services,
is also in the midst of change.
The community human service industry is
also preparing itself for change.
Organizations recognize the need to cut
costs and create new ways of providing
needed support services. However, a true
dialogue is needed between the state and its
community providers to create a better
system of high quality, cost effective
support services for people with
disabilities. Currently, the only plan that
seems to exist, is the one that slowly
squeezes the life out of community
organizations by denying them funding for
their increased costs-of-support. As this
happens, quality becomes compromised,
persons with disabilities fall into harm's
way and the state will ultimately be
vilified for allowing all of this to happen.
As with other industries regulated by the
state, a serious plan to restructure support
services for persons with disabilities must
be developed. A true and realistic
evaluation of: current and new resources;
needs; competition; deregulation;
technological improvements; provider
consolidation; etc., must be included in
this plan. This can only take place in an
environment of mutual trust and partnership
between the state and its community
providers.
Summary-More than ever, change is needed
and will come to the disability support
system in Illinois. It will start with joint
efforts between the state and community
providers to deal honestly, effectively and
persistently with the issues outlined here,
as well as many more yet to be identified.
Illinois clearly has the capacity to
become a model to the nation on how
disability support services can be delivered
in an effective, efficient and contemporary
manner. The will to do so requires a change
in the attitudes of all the principle
stakeholders. To not do so would jeopardize
the lives of the thousands of people with
disabilities who look to us for support
every day.